tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.comments2023-10-22T02:47:25.377-07:00The Machiavellian Messiah: Barack Hussein ObamaUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger23125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-34397825223829761542009-10-22T15:42:35.532-07:002009-10-22T15:42:35.532-07:00Funny, I always thought that about us conservative...Funny, I always thought that about us conservatives, Republicans, Christians, Americans, and any other class of people who prefer common sense, logic, and rational thinking over slushy sentimental glop and mockery.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-46961331939607157572009-08-05T17:55:28.684-07:002009-08-05T17:55:28.684-07:00Holy mackerel! A great blog post, and an even grea...Holy mackerel! A great blog post, and an even greater response. Let's start a grassroots movement to impeach Obama!!!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-66944067467556789752009-08-02T22:24:59.628-07:002009-08-02T22:24:59.628-07:00QUESTION:
What happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confi...QUESTION:<br /><br />What happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation as Supreme Court Justice if the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” Presidential eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate. <br /><br />Will not one Senator, let alone Republican Senator, raise this issue on the Senate floor? The nation is watching.<br /><br />Leave a ReplyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-26839828053086951342009-07-01T16:35:40.801-07:002009-07-01T16:35:40.801-07:00Thank you for this long-form blog post!!! Excellen...Thank you for this long-form blog post!!! Excellent work. I read (mostly) the WND article you linked (in)... ;)PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-11604376312321245322009-06-20T14:44:22.627-07:002009-06-20T14:44:22.627-07:00Yup, that tingling sensation was probably Chris Ma...Yup, that tingling sensation was probably Chris Matthews wetting himself over Obamamania.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-21516202866422625852009-06-17T23:50:46.011-07:002009-06-17T23:50:46.011-07:00the cool thing about the Obama Fly Swat is that Ob...the cool thing about the Obama Fly Swat is that Obama doesn't care about it... he isn't as uptight and distracted as either his opponents or his proponents areBandithttp://goldentoiletpaper.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-5559842174357833682009-06-17T14:37:27.500-07:002009-06-17T14:37:27.500-07:00Now Paul, get your terms correct: it was an Israel...Now Paul, get your terms correct: it was an Israeli fly-over!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-362051955048652492009-06-16T15:03:17.470-07:002009-06-16T15:03:17.470-07:00I watched/listened to the whole thing whilst blogg...I watched/listened to the whole thing whilst blogging, etc. E-gad! He lost me at "Keep it!"PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-38404757532157190912009-06-13T11:51:05.841-07:002009-06-13T11:51:05.841-07:00After untold numerous attempts to get me to watch ...After untold numerous attempts to get me to watch an entire Obama speech, you've finally succeeded! I endured to the end Our Beloved Tele-President's townhall speech, with all of its hope and audacity.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-88447616189858298882009-06-10T09:43:33.458-07:002009-06-10T09:43:33.458-07:00O my!O my!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-91614806895856696502009-06-09T10:33:40.815-07:002009-06-09T10:33:40.815-07:00Good post. How do you find this stuff?Good post. How do you find this stuff?PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-52390535074129029962009-06-08T20:42:46.096-07:002009-06-08T20:42:46.096-07:00Freudian slip: he meant to say he IS God!Freudian slip: he meant to say he IS God!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-50676854687524543562009-05-28T00:05:44.220-07:002009-05-28T00:05:44.220-07:00More details should surface to justify (or not) th...More details should surface to justify (or not) this snub (why not reschedule for later?) of the highest order.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-67516011581198027312009-04-30T15:54:00.000-07:002009-04-30T15:54:00.000-07:00Well done--or, in the words of Christian's compani...Well done--or, in the words of Christian's companion in the Pilgrim's Progress: "Well said!"PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-10209060902496702482009-04-17T08:21:00.000-07:002009-04-17T08:21:00.000-07:00I must say that this is an "extraordinary" post, n...I must say that this is an "extraordinary" post, not only because it's good, but because that very book title has been on my mind for a few days. "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" has been ringing in my head, and I almost did a search for it online. But alas, its true owner (you have the book) is swift to the battle front with his Mightier Pen aloft and his Sword (Word of God) at the ready.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-46415588466434589302009-02-27T20:37:00.000-08:002009-02-27T20:37:00.000-08:00Never thought I would thank you for sending me a l...Never thought I would thank you for sending me a link to the Communist Manifesto, but thanks. I think!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-84936673496081182862009-01-22T20:00:00.000-08:002009-01-22T20:00:00.000-08:00Paul, I don't know if you're getting these comment...Paul, I don't know if you're getting these comments, but here goes...<BR/>I read today's post after having read that WND article yesterday. I watched the video of the swearing in and noticed Justice Roberts originally stated "faithfully" at the end of the oath, not the beginning. Even though it may have been written as such, I believe "President" Obama was following Roberts' lead. This may or may not be a good thing. But I lay half the blame at Roberts' feet. I'll have to watch it again...PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-61785920527336469032009-01-22T19:54:00.000-08:002009-01-22T19:54:00.000-08:00Brilliant post!Brilliant post!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-89445533986819937922009-01-21T18:21:00.000-08:002009-01-21T18:21:00.000-08:00Brilliant post!Brilliant post!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-35560853437995176722008-12-15T17:48:00.000-08:002008-12-15T17:48:00.000-08:00Awesome blogposts!!! One suggestion: make your hyp...Awesome blogposts!!! One suggestion: make your hyperlinks a slightly brighter color, to further signify their hyperlinkedness. Great job, Paul. Enjoy reading your thoughtful, political/religious polemics and irenics. Whew!PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-37466467096768792622008-10-22T19:14:00.000-07:002008-10-22T19:14:00.000-07:00No, no, you have it all wrong. B.O. is bringing "c...No, no, you have it all wrong. B.O. is bringing "change." From bad to worse, arguably. Good--no, great--post!!! I really could not agree more. Superlatives on you.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-45672015632844000802008-10-17T20:50:00.000-07:002008-10-17T20:50:00.000-07:00Very good.Very good.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6564379336789646997.post-7419011437327417652008-10-15T14:39:00.000-07:002008-10-15T14:39:00.000-07:00This is pretty good. I happened to be sick at home...This is pretty good. I happened to be sick at home yesterday, and listened to Mike Gallagher on the radio. He said virtually the same things in your post. I have to agree with both of you.PETER RAMIREZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364555536486828330noreply@blogger.com